Two developments are drawing attention in the XRP ecosystem this week, and both carry the same underlying lesson for holders: activity on the ledger is not the same thing as demand for the asset. A scheduled protocol fix and Ripple's expanding stablecoin footprint each look bullish at first glance. Neither one, on closer inspection, guarantees fresh buying pressure for XRP itself.
Start with the technical side. A security correction expected today targets issued tokens on the XRP Ledger, not the native XRP supply. The change, designated fixCleanup3_4_0, is designed to stop accounts holding only a burn authorization from illicitly minting new tokens. Media reports point to activation around 14:46 UTC, though that timing hinges on validator backing. As of Monday, 33 of 35 observed validators supported the amendment, and that support must hold through the network's decisive voting point.
A Fix, Not a Breach
Activation is therefore not a done deal. A temporary dip in support already pushed back the intended schedule in October, and the voting mechanism remains the key caveat for today's target as well. Beyond the permission gap, the patch also repairs calculation errors in trading pools, vault functions and lending features. No publicly known exploitation of the authorization loophole has been reported — which sets this apart from a confirmed attack. The focus is on closing a technical weakness, not on cleaning up after documented damage.
Separately, developers are drafting additional rules for tokens with access restrictions. Those had neither been merged into the main software nor activated at the time of writing. The XRP Ledger Foundation characterized the work as routine protocol hardening rather than a security incident, and said it was unaware of any outside exploitation of the relevant exceptions. For investors, the distinction matters: the correction expected today and the proposed rules sit at very different stages of implementation.
Should investors sell immediately? Or is it worth buying XRP?
Garlinghouse Draws a Line Between XRP and RLUSD
On the business side, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse took to X yesterday to push back on the idea that XRP and the stablecoin RLUSD are rivals. The two are "complementary, not competing," he said. The nuance for XRP holders sits in the payment flow: more RLUSD transfers do not automatically mean customers must buy XRP to settle a payment.
XRP serves several functions on the ledger. The native asset is required for transaction fees and account reserves, and it can act as a bridge asset in decentralized exchange trading — a role it takes on when routing through XRP offers a better exchange rate. RLUSD plays a different part. The dollar-pegged token suits payments where a stable value matters, such as salaries, invoices and corporate transfers, as XRPL validator Vet put it. XRP, by contrast, is exposed to price swings.
Even an RLUSD transfer on the XRP Ledger incurs a fee in XRP, which is burned. The payment amount itself, however, can be settled directly in RLUSD. That yields a key separation: technical use of XRP does not equal proportionally strong demand for XRP as payment or bridge liquidity.
Garlinghouse had already said at Ripple Swell on October 28 that Ripple deploys XRP when it fits customer needs, and otherwise turns to fiat or RLUSD. His latest remark reaffirms XRP's role without promising its use in every transaction. Control mechanisms differ too. Ripple can freeze RLUSD under legal obligation; per Vet, XRP has no comparable central freeze authority. The assets diverge not only on price risk but on intervention powers. RLUSD also runs on Ethereum alongside the XRP Ledger — growth there implies no additional activity on the XRP Ledger.
Custody Is Not a Purchase Order
Institutional access widened on October 27, when BNY confirmed custody, holding and transfer of both assets for eligible clients. That expands institutional usability but proves no guaranteed XRP purchases. What matters for investors is which type of usage actually grows. Fees and account reserves create a technical need for XRP; bridge liquidity depends on the specific payment route and its terms. Garlinghouse's statement delineates the two assets' jobs — it does not establish a proportional XRP demand effect from rising RLUSD use.
XRP at a turning point? This analysis reveals what investors need to know now.
A further attention signal comes from wallet growth. According to Santiment, 7,934 new wallets appeared on the XRP Ledger on Sunday — the sixth-highest daily figure of 2026. New wallets are not automatically new users or buyers. The metric documents additional addresses, not a corresponding inflow of capital, and no concrete demand impact for XRP can be derived from it.
With XRP trading at 1.26 USD, the technical rollout takes center stage. The first question is whether the announced cleanup activates under current voting conditions. A confirmed completion would be clearly distinct from the expectation that preceded it — just as a busier ledger is distinct from a bid for the coin.
Ad
XRP Stock: New Analysis - 4 November
Fresh XRP information released. What's the impact for investors? Our latest independent report examines recent figures and market trends.
